Psychology and nonduality. Podcast on psychological suffering.

Imagine you're sitting in a perfectly safe, you know, climate-controlled room. The temperature is fine. There's no physical threat, no predators lurking in the corners, right? Yeah, totally safe. Yeah, totally safe. But your heart is just hammering against your ribs. Your adrenal glands are dumping this massive chemical cocktail into your bloodstream. Your breathing is shallow, and your brain is absolutely convinced that you are in mortal danger. It's basically a full system override. Exactly. And you have to wonder, I mean, why does the human mind manufacture its own predators? We've all been there. We've all tried to, you know, think our way out of a dark mood or sort of strategize our way out of a spiral of anxiety.

Oh, absolutely. But what if the very tool we're using to fix the problem, the mind itself, is actually the cage keeping us trapped? Welcome to a unique deep dive into the anatomy of psychological suffering and ultimately, you know, how we might alleviate it. And we have a really fascinating stack of sources to guide us today, exploring two wildly different approaches to this massive human problem. We really do. On one side, we're looking at clinical psychology and neuroscience. So we're talking about the biopsychosocial model, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychodynamic theories, and the literal, you know, microscopic physiological mechanics of neurotransmitters and stress hormones. Right. The hardware and the software of modern science.

And then on the other side of that conversation, we are looking at a completely different paradigm. Yeah, it's a totally different world. We are examining the collective teachings.the transcripts, and the books of sailor Bob Adamson. He was a teacher who spent nearly 50 years pointing people toward a radical, non-dual philosophy. And, you know, he didn't offer a new therapy. He offered a complete deconstruction of how we view our own minds. Which is just wild to think about. So our mission today for this deep dive is to explore how modern science and traditional therapies attempt to map and cure human suffering. And then we're going to reveal how Adamson's teachings actually intersect with those clinical approaches in a surprisingly perfect way before totally transcending them altogether.

Because he really points to a possibility of immediate non-conceptual freedom. He does. But, you know, to understand the cure, we have to deeply understand the disease first. We need to start with the physical reality of suffering. Like, what is actually happening mechanically in our bodies when we are stressed? Well, to really grasp the modern blueprint of suffering, we have to look closely at the physiology of stress. It starts with this microscopic chain reaction. Right. When you perceive a threat, notice I use the word perceive because it doesn't matter if it's a literal tiger chasing you or just, you know, an overwhelming vague email from your boss.

To dreaded, we need to talk email. Exactly. When you perceive that threat, your brain's amygdala sounds an alarm. And that alarm sends a distress signal to your hypothalamus. The hypothalamus is essentially the command center of your brain, and it communicates with the...rest of your body through the autonomic nervous system. So the command center gets the signal and it basically just hits the biological panic button. That's the HPA axis, the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis. Yeah. Once that button is pressed, your adrenal glands, which sit right on top of your kidneys, they start pumping out corticosteroids. Okay. So what does that actually mean? Well, specifically, we are talking about glucocorticoids like cortisol, hydrocortisone, and adrenaline.

Okay. Let's break down what those chemicals are actually doing because we throw around the word cortisol a lot in, you know, wellness culture and podcasts, but what is its actual mechanical function in that moment of panic? Cortisol's primary job in a crisis is to mobilize energy. It stimulates the synthesis of glucose in the liver, and it mobilizes fatty acids. So it's giving you fuel. Exactly. It is literally flooding your bloodstream with immediate combustible fuel so your muscles have the energy to either run away from that tiger or fight off an attacker. Fight or flight in action. Right. But at the same time. Because your body only has so much energy, cortisol actively shuts down functions that are non-essential in a life or death situation.

Like what? It suppresses your digestive system. It suppresses your reproductive system. Sure. It suppresses your immune system. Which, I mean, makes perfect biological sense. If you are literally running for your life, your body doesn't need to waste energy digesting your lunch or fighting off a mild cold, right? It's all power to the engines. The mechanism is a masterpiece of evolutionary engineering.It really is. Yeah. The problem is that it was designed for acute, short-term use. You run, you survive, the tiger leaves. Yeah. And then the cortisol levels drop back to a baseline. Your body returns to homeostasis. Right. But in our modern environment, the tiger never really leaves.

Right. The threat is constant. It's financial pressure. It's toxic hustle culture. It's the endless pinging of notifications. It's social media comparison. The perceived threat is perpetual. So the Grand Center just never turns off the alarm. The HPA axis just keeps firing away. What does that chronic exposure to cortisol actually do to the physical brain over time? This is where we cross the line from a biological survival mechanism into genuine psychological suffering. Chronic elevated cortisol is highly toxic to the brain. Over time, it severely disrupts the brain's neurotransmitter systems. Oh, wow. Let's look at serotonin first. Serotonin is often called the feel-good neurotransmitter, but that's a bit of an oversimplification, really.

It's more of a master regulator. It kind of keeps everything balanced. Yeah, it stabilizes mood, regulates sleep cycles, aids in digestion, and promotes a baseline of emotional balance. But chronic cortisol heavily suppresses the production and receptor sensitivity of serotonin. So your baseline of emotional stability just completely erodes. And what about dopamine? Because dopamine is the driver, right? It's the chemical that makes us want to get out of bed, pursue goals, you know, feel a sense of reward. Exactly. Dopamine is the currency of the brain's reward.When you accomplish a task or eat a good meal or have a positive social interaction, your brain releases dopamine and you feel a sense of satisfaction.

It feels good. Right. But chronic stress leads to something called dopamine depletion. The constant flood of cortisol actually blunts the brain's dopamine receptors. It takes more and more stimulation to feel even a tiny bit of pleasure until eventually the whole system just crashes. Which leads to a very specific and honestly devastating clinical condition. It's known as anhedonia. It is the absolute inability to feel pleasure. You lose interest in hobbies you used to love. You feel completely mentally drained. You can't focus. It literally zaps your fundamental sense of purpose. And our sources note this biological state is a primary engine of major depressive disorder. I mean, seeing how mechanical this all is, how a perceived threat triggers an alarm, which dumps a hormone, which suppresses a neurotransmitter, which causes depression, it completely explains why the medical establishment reacted the way it did in the mid-20th century.

It does. If it's a mechanical failure, we need a mechanical fix. That was the logical conclusion. In the 1960s, researchers observed the effects of the first antidepressant medications, like tricyclics and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, or MAOIs. They observed that these drugs artificially increased the presence of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin in the brain's synaptic clefts. And for many patients, elevating those chemicals alleviated the crippling symptoms of depression.And from that simple observation, the chemical imbalance theory of depression was born. It was a very compelling narrative. The idea was simple. Your brain is a soup of chemicals. If you are depressed, the soup is out of balance. You don't have enough serotonin.

Therefore, if we give you a pill that increases serotonin, the balance is restored and the depression goes away. And look, we should acknowledge that these medications have saved countless lives and provided absolutely vital, necessary relief for people in severe distress. But as our sources point out, modern neuroscience looks at that chemical imbalance theory today and says it is vastly oversimplified. It is widely criticized today as being reductionist. It's not that neurotransmitters aren't involved. They absolutely are, as we just discussed with cortisol and dopamine. Yeah, we just mapped that out. But framing depression or anxiety simply as a lack of serotonin is like saying a massive traffic jam in a major city is caused simply by a lack of green lights.

It's like a great analogy. It ignores the incredibly complex interconnected systems at play. It ignores neuroplasticity. It ignores trauma. It ignores the environment. And it ignores the psychological frameworks of the mind. So if biology is using chemistry to try and fix the physical hardware of the brain, psychology is stepping in to try and fix the software. Let's pivot a bit and map out the psychological frameworks we have in our sources. Because psychology approaches this suffering from a completely different angle. If I'm sitting in a therapist's office, how are they attempting to cure this distress?Let's trace the evolution of modern psychology, starting with the foundation, which is the psychodynamic approach.

This originated with Sigmund Freud in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and was later expanded by neo-Freudians like Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, and Melanie Klein. Okay, Freud. We've all heard of him. Right. And the core premise of this model is that human suffering stems from unconscious processes, specifically unresolved conflicts and traumas, usually deeply buried from early childhood. This is Freud's famous structural model of the mind. Let's actually explain how he believed the software of the mind was breaking down. So Freud proposed that the psyche is divided into three interacting systems. The id, the ego, and the superego. The big three. Yep. The id is the primitive, instinctual part of the mind.

It contains sexual and aggressive drives, and it operates entirely on the pleasure principle. It wants immediate gratification, regardless of the consequences. It's the part of the brain that says, I want to eat that entire cake right now, and I want to punch my boss in the face. Yes, exactly. But then you have the superego. The superego develops later. It is our internalized moral conscience. It's the rules, the cultural norms, and the moral judgments we absorb from our parents and society. It operates on a morality principle. So the superego is screaming, eating that cake is gluttonous and violence is abhorrent. You are a terrible person for even having those impulses.

Right. And caught right in the middle of this intense, silent war is the ego. The ego is the rational.conscious self. Its job is to mediate between the primitive demands of the id, the punishing moralism of the superego, and the actual practical reality of the external world. That sounds exhausting for the ego. It is. When the conflict between the id and the superego becomes too intense, it generates massive psychological pressure and anxiety. And the ego can't handle that pressure, so it has to vent the steam somehow. It deploys unconscious defense mechanisms. It uses repression to push the conflict out of conscious awareness. It uses projection to take its own unacceptable feelings and attribute them to someone else.

It uses displacement. It's all just shifting the energy around. Exactly. The psychodynamic theory posits that your current psychological distress, your panic attacks, your relationship failures, your deep depressions, are the result of these unconscious defense mechanisms failing. Or of remaining emotionally stuck in repetitive, self-defeating patterns established in childhood. So the mechanism of cure in psychoanalysis is insight. You dive into the past, you spend years on a couch excavating those hidden conflicts, and you bring them into the light of conscious awareness. The idea is that once the ego understands the hidden conflict, the conflict loses its power and the ego becomes stronger. That was the goal, certainly.

But as the decades passed, the psychological community ran into a significant problem. Yeah. Psychoanalysis assumes that if we just dig up the past and gain insight, we will heal. Right, but... But what happens when someone knows exactly why they are traumatized?Like, they know exactly what their parents did. They understand all their defense mechanisms. But they still have a debilitating panic attack every time they walk into a crowded grocery store. Yeah, it's like knowing the blueprints of the haunted house doesn't stop you from being terrified of the ghost. There is a gap between knowing your past and actually changing your behavior in the present. And that failure, that gap, is what forced psychology to invent a new tool.

Which brings us to cognitive behavioral therapy, or CBT. Emerging in the 1960s, spearheaded by figures like Aaron Beck and Albert Ellis, CBT offered a radical departure from psychoanalysis. A totally new way to look at the software. Right. Beck argued that we don't necessarily need to spend years excavating the unconscious past. He proposed that psychological distress is actively maintained by maladaptive thought patterns occurring right now in the present moment. Let's break down the mechanics of CBT because it's arguably the most dominant form of therapy today. How does a thought actually cause the biological panic we talked about earlier? CBT is based on a very specific cognitive model.

It states that it is not a situation that causes our feelings. It is our interpretation of that situation. Let's go back to the example of getting a vague email from your boss that says, we need to talk. Okay, the panic email. The psychodynamic approach might ask how that email reminds you of your father's disapproval. CBT doesn't care about your father in that moment. CBT looks at the immediate automatic thought that flashes through your mind. The thought is, I'm getting fired. I'm going to lose my house. I'm going to be.That is a cognitive distortion. Beck identified several of these, and the one you just described is called catastrophizing, jumping to the absolute worst possible conclusion.

Another common one is mind reading, assuming you know someone else is judging you, or all or nothing thinking. The CBT mechanism of cure is to intercept that specific thought. You catch the thought, you challenge it with evidence, and you replace it. Yes. You ask yourself, what is the actual evidence I am getting fired? Well, I just got a good performance review last month. Therefore, this thought is a distortion. You actively replace the catastrophic thought with a realistic, adaptive thought. By changing the thought, you prevent the amygdala from sounding the alarm. You stop the cortisol cascade before it even begins. And finally, to bring the biological and the psychological together, our sources outline the biopsychosocial model, introduced by George Engel in the late 1970s.

This is the holistic view that says you can't look at mental health through just one lens. Right. Engel recognized that human suffering is too complex for a single discipline. The biopsychosocial model argues that health and illness are the result of a continuous complex interplay. So it's everything all at once. Exactly. You have biological factors like your genetic predisposition and your neurotransmitter baselines. You have psychological factors like your cognitive distortions and your ego defenses. And you have social factors like your socioeconomic status, your cultural background, and the quality of your relationships.To treat the whole system. Okay, let's pause here and look at this massive architecture of healing we've just built.

Science is giving us chemistry to manage our neurotransmitters. Psychodynamic therapy is giving us tools to excavate our childhoods and strengthen our egos. CBT is giving us worksheets to catch and replace our distorted thoughts. We are throwing everything we have at the human mind. You really are. But I have to ask the uncomfortable question. If we are constantly replacing bad thoughts with good thoughts and constantly analyzing our past traumas to build a stronger sense of self, aren't we just endlessly rearranging the furniture in a burning house? Oh, that's a good way to put it. I mean, we're trying to make the living room look a little more organized, but the walls are still collapsing.

Is there a flaw in the very foundation of how we are treating the mind? That is the perfect pivot point for this deep dive. Because if we look closely at this entire clinical landscape, whether we're talking about psychoanalysis, trying to build a stronger ego, or CVT, trying to correct a person's individual thought patterns, all of these therapies share one massive, foundational, entirely unquestioned assumption. I feel like you're about to pull the rug out from under a century of modern therapy. What is the assumption? The assumption is that there is a self that needs fixing. Every single clinical model we've discussed assumes the inherent existence of an independent, separate entity, a you, that is fundamentally broken, damaged by the past, threatened by the future, and in desperate need of repair.

And this is...is exactly where the teachings of Sailor Bob Adamson enter the picture and dismantle the entire paradigm. Completely. So Sailor Bob Adamson, as our sources detail, he spent nearly 50 years pointing people toward the philosophy of non-duality. And looking at his books like Presence Awareness and As It Is, he covers this topic relentlessly from every possible angle. He was incredibly consistent. Yeah, he offers a radically different diagnosis for the root cause of psychological suffering. According to Adamson, human suffering isn't fundamentally about what happened to you. The trauma, the bad childhood, the vague email, those are just events. Right. The suffering is generated entirely by the belief in who it happened to.

Adamson targets the very root of the problem, far below the cognitive distortions or the ego defenses. He points out that all of our anxieties, our fears, our deep wells of self-pity, and our existential depressions stem from one single unexamined belief. And that's the belief that we are a separate localized entity living inside a body separate from the rest of the universe. Let's trace the origin story of the self, because Adamson explains its genesis beautifully, and it really demystifies what can sometimes sound like a very esoteric mystical concept. He points out that we aren't born with the self. A tiny child, prior to the age of two or two and a half, lives in a completely natural primal state of awareness.

They are pure experiencing. They are in amongst it all, seeing, hearing, tasting, feeling, without any concept.[PRINT_WORDLEVEL_TIME]<00:00.0> actual</00:00.3> <00:00.3> division.</00:00.8> <00:01.6> Adamson</00:02.0> <00:02.1> often</00:02.4> <00:02.5> referenced</00:02.9> <00:02.9> a</00:03.0> <00:03.0> classic</00:03.5> <00:03.5> developmental</00:04.0> <00:04.0> psychology</00:04.6> <00:04.6> observation.</00:05.2> <00:05.7> If</00:05.8> <00:05.8> you</00:05.9> <00:05.9> put</00:06.0> <00:06.1> a</00:06.1> <00:06.1> child</00:06.5> <00:06.5> under</00:06.7> <00:06.7> the</00:06.8> <00:06.8> age</00:06.9> <00:07.0> of</00:07.0> <00:07.1> two</00:07.2> <00:07.4> in</00:07.5> <00:07.5> front</00:07.7> <00:07.7> of</00:07.8> <00:07.8> a</00:07.8> <00:07.9> mirror</00:08.3> <00:08.5> and</00:08.7> <00:08.7> you</00:08.8> <00:08.9> daub</00:09.3> <00:09.4> a</00:09.4> <00:09.4> spot</00:09.7> <00:09.7> of</00:09.8> <00:09.8> red</00:10.0> <00:10.1> paint</00:10.4> <00:10.4> on</00:10.5> <00:10.5> their</00:10.7> <00:10.7> nose,</00:11.2> <00:11.7> the</00:11.8> <00:11.8> child</00:12.0> <00:12.1> doesn't</00:12.3> <00:12.3> reach</00:12.5> <00:12.5> for</00:12.6> <00:12.6> their</00:12.7> <00:12.7> own</00:12.9> <00:12.9> face.</00:13.4> <00:13.6> Right,</00:13.9> <00:13.9> they</00:14.0> <00:14.0> reach</00:14.2> <00:14.2> for</00:14.3> <00:14.3> the</00:14.4> <00:14.4> mirror.</00:14.7> <00:14.8> They</00:15.0> <00:15.0> reach</00:15.2> <00:15.2> for</00:15.2> <00:15.3> the</00:15.3> <00:15.3> glass.</00:15.8> <00:16.0> They</00:16.2> <00:16.2> see</00:16.3> <00:16.3> the</00:16.4> <00:16.5> reflection.</00:17.1> <00:17.5> But</00:17.7> <00:17.8> the</00:18.0> <00:18.0> cognitive</00:18.6> <00:18.6> self-awareness,</00:19.3> <00:19.4> the</00:19.4> <00:19.5> conceptual</00:20.0> <00:20.1> leap</00:20.3> <00:20.3> of</00:20.5> <00:20.8> that</00:21.0> <00:21.0> image</00:21.2> <00:21.3> is</00:21.4> <00:21.4> me,</00:21.7> <00:21.9> has</00:22.1> <00:22.1> not</00:22.2> <00:22.3> yet</00:22.4> <00:22.5> formed</00:22.7> <00:22.8> in</00:22.8> <00:22.8> the</00:22.9> <00:22.9> brain.</00:23.3> <00:23.5> They</00:23.6> <00:23.6> don't</00:23.8> <00:23.8> know</00:24.0> <00:24.1> they're</00:24.3> <00:24.4> a</00:24.4> <00:24.5> separate</00:24.8> <00:24.8> thing</00:25.0> <00:25.0> yet.</00:25.3> <00:25.5> But</00:25.6> <00:25.6> eventually,</00:26.1> <00:26.2> cognitive</00:26.6> <00:26.6> reasoning</00:27.0> <00:27.0> kicks</00:27.3> <00:27.3> in,</00:27.5> <00:27.8> language</00:28.2> <00:28.2> develops,</00:28.8> <00:29.0> and</00:29.1> <00:29.1> the</00:29.2> <00:29.2> child</00:29.6> <00:29.6> acquires</00:30.1> <00:30.2> a</00:30.2> <00:30.2> specific</00:30.7> <00:30.7> word.</00:31.1> <00:31.3> They</00:31.5> <00:31.5> acquire</00:31.9> <00:31.9> the</00:32.0> <00:32.1> word</00:32.3> <00:32.6> I.</00:33.0> <00:33.3> And</00:33.5> <00:33.5> this</00:33.6> <00:33.7> is</00:33.8> <00:33.8> where</00:33.9> <00:33.9> the</00:34.0> <00:34.0> trouble</00:34.3> <00:34.3> begins.</00:34.8> <00:35.2> I</00:35.2> <00:36.2> is</00:36.3> <00:36.3> just</00:36.5> <00:36.5> a</00:36.5> <00:36.6> word.</00:36.8> <00:36.9> It's</00:37.1> <00:37.1> a</00:37.1> <00:37.2> pronoun.</00:37.5> <00:37.6> Yeah.</00:37.8> <00:38.0> On</00:38.2> <00:38.2> its</00:38.3> <00:38.3> own,</00:38.7> <00:38.8> it</00:38.9> <00:38.9> has</00:39.1> <00:39.1> no</00:39.2> <00:39.2> actual</00:39.5> <00:39.6> substance.</00:40.1> <00:40.3> It</00:40.4> <00:40.4> doesn't</00:40.6> <00:40.6> mean</00:40.8> <00:40.9> much.</00:41.3> <00:41.8> So,</00:42.1> <00:42.4> as</00:42.6> <00:42.6> Adamson</00:43.0> <00:43.0> explains,</00:43.7> <00:43.9> because</00:44.1> <00:44.2> the</00:44.3> <00:44.3> mind</00:44.6> <00:44.6> can't</00:44.9> <00:44.9> do</00:45.1> <00:45.1> much</00:45.3> <00:45.4> with</00:45.5> <00:45.5> just</00:45.7> <00:45.7> the</00:45.8> <00:45.8> empty</00:46.0> <00:46.1> concept</00:46.5> <00:46.5> of</00:46.6> <00:46.7> I,</00:47.0> <00:47.5> we</00:47.6> <00:47.6> have</00:47.7> <00:47.7> to</00:47.8> <00:47.8> start</00:48.0> <00:48.0> dressing</00:48.4> <00:48.4> it</00:48.4> <00:48.5> up.</00:48.6> <00:48.6> We</00:48.7> <00:48.7> start</00:48.9> <00:48.9> attaching</00:49.4> <00:49.4> things</00:49.7> <00:49.7> to</00:49.9> <00:49.9> it.</00:50.0> <00:50.0> We</00:50.1> <00:50.2> attach</00:50.4> <00:50.5> events.</00:50.9> <00:50.9> We</00:51.0> <00:51.0> attach</00:51.3> <00:51.3> preferences.</00:51.8> <00:51.9> We</00:52.0> <00:52.0> attach</00:52.3> <00:52.3> conditioning</00:52.8> <00:52.9> and</00:53.0> <00:53.0> labels</00:53.3> <00:53.3> from</00:53.4> <00:53.5> our</00:53.6> <00:53.6> parents.</00:54.1> <00:54.2> I</00:54.3> <00:54.3> am</00:54.4> <00:54.4> a</00:54.5> <00:54.5> boy.</00:54.8> <00:55.3> I</00:55.4> <00:55.4> am</00:55.5> <00:55.5> a</00:55.5> <00:55.6> girl.</00:55.9> <00:55.9> I</00:56.0> <00:56.0> am</00:56.1> <00:56.1> smart.</00:56.5> <00:56.7> I</00:56.7> <00:56.8> am</00:56.9> <00:56.9> anxious.</00:57.4> <00:57.6> I</00:57.7> <00:57.8> had</00:57.9> <00:57.9> a</00:57.9> <00:58.0> terrible</00:58.3> <00:58.3> childhood.</00:58.9> <00:59.2> I</00:59.4> <00:59.4> am</00:59.5> <00:59.5> a</00:59.6> <00:59.6> successful</01:00.2> <01:00.2> executive.</01:00.9> <01:02.1> We</01:02.2> <01:02.2> take</01:02.4> <01:02.4> a</01:02.5> <01:02.6> lifetime</01:03.0> <01:03.0> of</01:03.2> <01:03.2> dead</01:03.5> <01:03.5> memories</01:03.9> <01:03.9> and</01:04.0> <01:04.0> we</01:04.1> <01:04.1> glue</01:04.4> <01:04.4> them</01:04.6> <01:04.6> to</01:04.7> <01:04.7> this</01:04.9> <01:04.9> pronoun.</01:05.4> <01:05.7> We</01:05.8> <01:05.8> build</01:06.0> <01:06.1> a</01:06.2> <01:06.2> massive,</01:06.8> <01:06.8> complex,</01:07.5> <01:07.5> conceptual</01:08.2> <01:08.2> image</01:08.5> <01:08.5> of</01:08.6> <01:08.6> ourselves.</01:09.1> <01:09.8> Adelson</01:10.1> <01:10.1> notes</01:10.3> <01:10.3> that</01:10.5> <01:10.5> the</01:10.6> <01:10.6> very</01:10.8> <01:10.9> word</01:11.1> <01:11.1> person</01:11.6> <01:11.8> originates</01:12.2> <01:12.2> from</01:12.4> <01:12.4> the</01:12.5> <01:12.5> Latin</01:12.8> <01:12.8> word</01:13.0> <01:13.0> persona,</01:13.5> <01:13.8> which</01:14.0> <01:14.0> literally</01:14.4> <01:14.4> translates</01:14.9> <01:14.9> to</01:15.0> <01:15.0> the</01:15.1> <01:15.1> mask</01:15.4> <01:15.5> worn</01:15.7> <01:15.7> by</01:15.8> <01:15.9> actors</01:16.2> <01:16.2> in</01:16.3> <01:16.3> ancient</01:16.6> <01:16.6> theater.</01:17.0> <01:17.1> We</01:17.2> <01:17.3> build</01:17.5> <01:17.5> this</01:17.6> <01:17.7> conceptual</01:18.2> <01:18.2> mask</01:18.5> <01:18.5> out</01:18.7> <01:18.7> of</01:18.8> <01:18.8> thoughts.</01:19.3> <01:19.3> And</01:19.5> <01:19.5> because</01:19.8> <01:19.8> we</01:19.9> <01:19.9> interact</01:20.3> <01:20.3> with</01:20.4> <01:20.4> the</01:20.5> <01:20.5> world</01:20.7> <01:20.8> through</01:20.9> <01:20.9> this</01:21.1> <01:21.1> mask</01:21.3> <01:21.4> day</01:21.6> <01:21.6> in</01:21.7> <01:21.7> and</01:21.8> <01:21.8> day</01:22.0> <01:22.0> out,</01:22.2> <01:22.2> because</01:22.5> <01:22.5> society</01:22.9> <01:23.0> reinforces</01:23.5> <01:23.5> it</01:23.6> <01:23.7> constantly,</01:24.3> <01:24.6> we</01:24.8> <01:24.8> pour</01:25.0> <01:25.1> the</01:25.2> <01:25.2> immense</01:25.5> <01:25.6> energy</01:26.0> <01:26.0> of</01:26.1> <01:26.1> our</01:26.2> <01:26.2> belief</01:26.5> <01:26.6> into</01:26.8> <01:26.8> it.</01:27.0> <01:27.4> We</01:27.6> <01:27.6> believe</01:27.9> <01:27.9> in</01:28.0> <01:28.0> it</01:28.1> <01:28.1> so</01:28.3> <01:28.3> deeply</01:28.6> <01:28.7> that</01:28.8> <01:28.8> it</01:28.9> <01:28.9> begins</01:29.2> <01:29.2> to</01:29.3> <01:29.3> feel</01:29.6> <01:29.7> incredible.</01:30.0>Incredibly solid, incredibly real.

Well, completely real. This mask becomes what Adamson calls the reference point. And once that reference point is firmly established in the mind, we refer every single thing that happens in the universe back to it. It becomes the filter for all reality. And what's crucial to understand here is how Adamson equates this mind-made reference point entirely with time. He asks his listeners a very simple, very provocative question to test the reality of this self. He asks, what past is there unless you think about it? Which, when you actually pause and look at it, is a staggering question. Where are yesterday's thoughts? They are entirely gone. Where is your childhood trauma right now, in this exact second, in the room you are sitting in?

It isn't there. If you think about something terrible that happened 10 years ago, you are experiencing a thought about it right now. Exactly. The me that we believe ourselves to be, the entity that therapy is trying so hard to fix, only exists as a collection of dead memories pulled from the past, or as imagined, fearful projections anticipated in the future. The mind itself is time. Adamson demonstrates. That the reference point has no actual tangible substance in the immediate living reality of the present moment. It is a phantom. It is a total fiction constructed of language and memory. Okay, hold on. Let me play the role of the highly skeptical listener here.

Because if someone is listening to this who just lost their job or is dealing with clinical depression or suffers from debilitating panic attacks, hearing... Your concept of self is just...An illusion sounds incredibly dismissive. I can see that, yeah. It sounds like spiritual bypassing, you know? It sounds like we are telling them their pain isn't real. When my heart races and my stomach ties in knots and I can't breathe, it doesn't feel like a phantom. It feels like a very real, terrifying biological event. How does Adamson defend the claim that the self is an illusion in the face of such overwhelming physical distress? It's a vital question.

And Adamson addresses it by making a brilliant and absolute distinction between physical pain and psychological suffering. He is not deny the reality of biology. If you are slicing vegetables in your kitchen and you accidentally cut your finger, or if you break a bone, that is physical pain. It is real biological data. Right. You can locate it precisely in space and time. Your body's nervous system is sending a necessary functional signal to the brain that tissue is damaged and requires immediate attention. The x-ray shows the broken bone. The blood is visible on the cutting board. Exactly. Physical pain is a mechanism of survival. But what about the knot in the stomach or the lump in the throat or the heavy ache in the heart that you feel when you are crippled by anxiety over a potential job loss or consumed by grief over a past relationship?

Adamson points out that this is psychological suffering manifesting physically. It's a reaction. Right. If a surgeon were to open your throat when you feel that anxious lump, they wouldn't find a tumor. They wouldn't find damaged tissue. You cannot locate it physically because it is not a biological injury. It is a physical symptom generated purely by...It is a bodily sensation triggered entirely by a believed-in thought. Remember our discussion about the HPA axis and cortisol. The brain's amygdala cannot tell the difference between a real physical tiger standing in front of you and a vivid, catastrophic thought about losing your house in six months. The machine just reacts.

The biological machine simply reacts to the data it is fed. If the mind feeds it a terrifying concept, the body dumps the cortisol, and you feel the physical knot in your stomach. So the physical sensation is real biology, but the cause of the sensation is a phantom. The body is basically reacting to a ghost. Precisely. And this understanding leads us to what we might call Adamson's precise mechanical formula for psychological suffering. If the me is just a conceptual reference point, a mask made of memories, how does it actually operate the machinery of human misery? Adamson argues that all psychological suffering is caused by one specific mechanism, and that's the me resisting what is.

Let's deeply unpack the mechanics of this conflict, because if we understand this, we understand the core engine of our own pain. The reference point, this mask we've built, has a primary function. It divides reality into pairs of opposites. It constantly labels the universe as good or bad, pleasant or painful, acceptable or unacceptable, based entirely on our past conditioning and memories. It is a judgment machine. And when an event happens that the reference point labels as good, say you get a promotion or you fall in love or you just have a perfectly peaceful afternoon, what is the immediate reaction?It wants to possess it. It wants to hold on to it.

It wants to freeze time and keep that good feeling forever. But the fundamental, inescapable nature of reality of the entire universe is transience. Everything moves. Everything changes. Relationships end. Jobs change. The peaceful afternoon turns into a stormy night. The good thing eventually fades or moves on. And because the reference point has staked its happiness on keeping that temporary thing permanent, it resists its passing. The mind fights the change. And conversely, when something happens that the reference point labels as bad, an insult, a physical illness, a traffic jam, we immediately want to alter, modify, or correct it. We push it away. We fight it. This shouldn't be happening to me.

In both scenarios, desperately clinging to the good or aggressively pushing away the bad, the underlying mechanism is identical. It's resistance. You are resisting the reality of the present moment. Adamson spells out the equation very clearly. Resistance equals conflict. You are at war with reality. And conflict equals disease. You are uneasy. And if you hold on to that internal friction, that psychological dis-ease long enough, it triggers a cortisol, it burns out the dopamine, and it eventually manifests as actual physical disease in the body. He uses an incredible illuminating analogy of nature to demonstrate just how bizarre and unnatural this human mechanism of resistance really is. He says, look at the ocean tide.

When the tide is fully in, washing up on the beach, it doesn't sit there wishing it was out. It takes its time. It stays.in and then naturally it goes out. Winter doesn't rage against summer. The silence doesn't go to war with the sound. They are opposites, certainly. You can't have winter without summer. But they aren't in opposition. They aren't fighting each other. That is a crucial distinction. In the natural world, there is no reference point. There is no conceptual me to judge the process. A tree doesn't judge the autumn for making its leaves fall, and it doesn't suffer anxiety wondering if the spring will return.

Nature simply vibrates in interrelated opposites, perfectly accepting exactly what is occurring in the immediate moment. It is only the human mind, operating from the localized fearful me, that constantly resists the natural functioning of reality. We are the only part of nature that constantly argues with nature. I don't like this weather. I shouldn't feel this sad. I want to be happy again. Why did they say that to me? It is an exhausting, endless cycle of resistance. So, if the me resisting reality is the engine of all psychological suffering, how do we turn the engine off? This is where we reach the crux of our deep dive.

This is the moment of divergence, where Adamson's non-dual teachings dramatically split from the clinical therapeutic models we discussed in the first half of the show. Before we explain that split, I want to be extremely careful to clarify something, because it is very easy for modern listeners to misinterpret non-dual teachings as being dismissive of Western medicine or promoting some kind of anti-science spiritual bypassing. The sources make it abundantly clear that Adamson was absolutely not anti-He was not anti-medicine. In his own life, he actively experimented with nutrition, supplements, Bowen therapy, ionizers. He had no objection whatsoever to treating the physical body. Not at all. Adamson recognized that biology is entirely valid.

He viewed the physical brain simply as an instrument. It is an organ, just like your kidney, your liver, or your lungs. To explain the function of the brain, he used an absolutely brilliant analogy of an electrical transformer. I love this analogy. It perfectly bridges the gap between the infinite and the biological. Let's really unpack how he described this. Adamson suggested that the universe is permeated by pure, unmanifested intelligence energy. It is the raw power of existence. But the human body cannot operate on that raw power. He compared it to the electricity in your house. The power grid delivers 240 volts of raw electricity to your wall socket.

If you take a delicate 12-volt appliance like a small radio and you plug it directly into that 240-volt socket without a transformer, what happens? It explodes. The circuits completely fry. The instrument cannot handle the raw current. Exactly. So you use a transformer. The transformer's sole job is to step down that massive, overwhelming energy into a manageable 12-volt current that the radio can actually use to play music. Adamson viewed the physical brain as the body's transformer. Its biological function is to step down the infinite, non-conceptual intelligence energy of the universe into manageable, localized 12-volt thoughts and physical movements.It translates the infinite into the functional. It's a biological transmitter, and because it is a physical organ made of tissue and chemicals, it can suffer physical deficiencies.

Yes. If a transformer has a frayed wire or a blown fuse, it won't work properly. If a human has physical brain damage, a chemical deficiency, a tumor, or a severe nutritional lack affecting their neurotransmitters, atoms are fully supported using medicine or physical therapies to correct the hardware. If the physical machine is broken, you use physical tools to fix the machine. But, and here's the climax of our exploration today, where modern psychology completely misses the mark, according to Adamson, is how it approaches the software, how it approaches the mind. Let's look closely at where the therapies intersect with Adamson and where they ultimately fail. Therapies like CBT and psychodynamic theory actually get incredibly close to the truth.

They are halfway there. They correctly identify the mechanism. CBT clearly sees that a believed-in thought causes distress. Psychoanalysis clearly sees that past conditioning dictates present behavior. They understand that the conceptual mind is causing the biological panic. They see the mechanism, but their solution is still trapped in the same paradigm. Their solution is to try and fix the self. Right. Ego psychology dives into the trauma of childhood in order to build a stronger, more resilient, better adapted ego. CBT trains you to catch maladaptive thought and replace it with a positive, more rational thought. It's still operating within the realm of duality. It's still using the mind to try and fix the mind.

It's like taking your car to the mechanic because there is a definite...terrifying series of explosions happening under the hood. The mechanic opens it up, looks inside, and realizes the noise is the engine. An internal combustion engine is literally designed to make explosions. You can't fix the explosions by tinkering with the spark plugs or replacing a bad explosion with a good explosion. If you want the noise to stop, you have to step out of the car entirely. That analogy perfectly captures the limitation of modern therapy. As brilliant and helpful as CBT or psychoanalysis can be for making the mask more comfortable or making the dream a little less terrifying, they lack the final radical step.

They never stop to question the very existence of the self they are trying so desperately to heal. They assume the reference point is a real, solid entity. Adamson points out that the reference point is a conceptual illusion. And the moment you clearly see through an illusion, the illusion loses its power to cause suffering. So, practically speaking, how do we actually alleviate suffering? If the answer isn't spending 10 years on a psychoanalyst's couch excavating our childhood trauma, and it isn't rigorously filling out CBT worksheets every time we have a cognitive distortion, What is Adamson's radical pointing? How do we step out of the car? The most striking paradigm-shifting difference is the concept of time.

Therapy inherently implies a future. It implies a journey. You are broken now. But if you do the work, in six months or five years, you will eventually be healed. It requires time. Adamson, conversely, points to a possibility of immediate recognition.Because you don't need time to realize you are not the mask. Right. He often said, you don't need to awaken from the dream. You just need to realize that it is a dream. Think about being caught in a terrifying nightmare. You are running from a monster. In the dream, the fear is absolute. Your dream body is sweating. But the moment you become lucid, the split second you realize, oh, I'm lying in bed.

This is a dream. You don't have to fight the monster anymore. You don't have to negotiate with it. You don't have to replace the thought of the monster with a thought of a puppy. The nightmare instantly loses all its terror, not because the images vanish, but because you recognize their illusory nature. And he offers a very specific, incredibly actionable insight for how to trigger this recognition. He doesn't prescribe hours of difficult meditation or complex mantras. He advises people to simply pause a thought. Relaxing attention from its total entrapment in mental activity. Just pause. Full stop. When you actually do that, when you just pause a thought for a split second, what actually happens in reality?

Well, let's look at it. If you pause the thinking mind, you don't disappear into a puff of smoke. You don't evaporate into a void of nothingness. Your heart keeps beating. The room around you is still perfectly visible. The sounds of the street outside are still being heard. The sensation of the chair beneath you is still felt. Life continues to function flawlessly without the narrator. Exactly. But in that tiny gap, in that instant between thoughts, can you say anything is good or bad? Can you feel anxiety about tomorrow?Can you feel resentment about yesterday? No, because you physically cannot feel resentment without pulling up a memory of the past.

You cannot feel anxiety without projecting an image of the future. You need a thought to label reality as unacceptable. Without the thought, there's just clear open space. It is the immediate recognition of non-conceptual space. It's an awareness where absolutely nothing is wrong. The functioning of life is happening, but the psychological suffering has vanished because the entity that was resisting reality is entirely absent. This brings us to what I consider to be his ultimate, most devastating pointer. He constantly asked his listeners to reflect on the nature of thinking with one question. What is wrong with right now unless you think about it? It's a question designed to completely short-circuit the conceptual mind.

Because if you try to answer it, the mind immediately scrambles to find a problem. It searches the past for a trauma or it searches the future for a threat. But in the pure, unmediated immediacy of right now, a fraction of a second before a label or a judgment is applied, everything is simply exactly as it is. It is unaltered, unmodified, uncorrected reality. Now, the obvious pushback from a listener is, okay, but I can't walk around all day in a thoughtless trance. I have a job. I have a family. I have to interact with the world. To explain how we can realize this truth without becoming catatonic zombies, Adamson uses the analogy of the blue sea.

It is a masterful, beautiful metaphor for life after realization. We stand on a cliff and look out at the ocean andwe see vast, beautiful, deep blue water. Our eyes perceive blueness. It is a very convincing appearance. But if I ask you to walk down to the beach, take a bucket, and scoop up some of that blue water, what happens? You pull up a bucket, look inside, and the water is perfectly, brilliantly clear. You literally cannot capture the blue. Right. You know, fundamentally beyond a shadow of a doubt that the ocean isn't actually blue. The blueness is just an appearance. It's a trick of light and reflection from the sky.

But here is the genius of the analogy. Knowing that the water is actually clear doesn't stop you from enjoying the view of the blue ocean. You don't have to close your eyes. You aren't fooled by the appearance anymore, but the appearance continues to happen. And this is exactly how Adamson describes life after seeing through the illusion of the conceptual me. Once you deeply investigate the reference point, once you look for the self and realize it has no actual substance, that it's just a bucket of clear water, the appearances of life still continue. You don't turn to stone. Thoughts still arise from the brain. Emotions still happen.

You might feel a sudden surge of anger or a wave of profound sadness or immense bubbling joy. The biological transformer still works. But the crucial life-altering difference is that those thoughts and emotions no longer have anywhere to stick. Because there is no longer a solid, believed in, heavily trended me for the anger to latch onto, it simply arises, it plays out its energetic vibration in the body, and it dissolves back into the clear water. You are no longer taken in by the mirage.You don't build a story around the sadness. You don't try to lock the joy in a cage. The resistance drops, the conflict ends, and the psychological suffering simply evaporates.

It's just pure functioning. The tide comes in, the tide goes out, the winter comes, the winter goes. And you are the clear space in which it all happens. It is a profound tectonic shift. It is the shift from frantically trying to manage, heal, and optimize the suffering of the self to the peaceful recognition that the entity who is suffering is nothing more than a conceptual mirage. Which brings us to the end of our journey today. We started in the thick, heavy weeds of biology. We looked at the punishing burden of cortisol, the exhaustion of hustle culture, and the very real physical toll of chronic stress on our dopamine receptors.

We looked at the immense noble efforts of modern psychology, from Freud's structural models to Beck's cognitive restructuring, to try and fix our broken software by rearranging our thoughts and digging through our pasts to find some semblance of peace. And then we shifted paradigms. We looked through the lens of Sailor Bob Adamson, who for decades pointed out a radically simple truth that the me we were trying so desperately to protect, to heal, and to fix is just a phantom. It's a pronoun we learned when we were two years old, dressed up in decades of dead memories, creating a constant painful friction with the living reality of the present moment.

The ultimate cure for the disease of psychological resistance isn't fixing the mask so it fits better. The cure is recognizing that it is, and always has been, just a mask.So we want to leave you with a final thought to mull over, something to experiment with in your own life. The next time you feel a sudden surge of psychological suffering, maybe it's a tight knot of anxiety in your stomach before a meeting, or a heavy wave of resentment towards someone who wronged you, instead of rushing to fix the feeling or analyze where it came from in your childhood or replace it with a positive affirmation, just pause.

Pause the thought and ask yourself, who is the I that is feeling this? Look inward for that solid reference point. Try to find the actual entity that is suffering. Try to locate it. And in that silent, non-conceptual space where you inevitably fail to find it, notice what remains. Thank you so much for joining us on this deep dive. Keep your five senses wide open to the reality of the present moment. Because it turns out that diagnostic machine wasn't broken at all. We were just holding up an x-ray of a ghost, exhausting ourselves trying to find the bones. Until next time.