This transcript was made by speech-recognition software, so names and some words may be misheard. The recording is the original: watch on YouTube.
I'm sort of thinking, okay, well, if I'm seeing it as subject and object, which bit should I examine, the subject or the object? Well, basically, it all boils down to the belief in a separate entity, the pseudo-subject, me. Cancel that out, see that there's nothing there. What are you going to refer it to without that reference point? Then it all becomes the so-called object. It all becomes the so-called object? Well, not even an object. Just expressions of that essence, one essence. Not an object at all. Just a seed. Can you separate any of these so-called objects, you believe me, objects, away from the seed? Well, what are they?
They must actually be the seed. Seeing has no place to it. There's no location. Just actually feeling into where is that seeing happening, and really feeling like where is that? You can't find a place. There's no subject. And it's alive. Seeing is totally alive and real and full of energy. Whereas the subject would be, if I am a subject, or if there is even a subject, it would have to be a fixed point that's static and dead, located somewhere. And when you really look, where is that seeing happening, it's obvious that there's no place. There's no actual place. And it's alive. It's not this sort of static concept of just some fixed place.
Instead of seeing and looking and seeing where it's happening and seeing that there's no point of reference anywhere, who's willing to say, here, that's the question? Yeah. Who's it happening to? Me. Well, the me believes it is the seer. It's him when you've got this idea or concept of me. It becomes a pseudo-subject, the seer. But it's not actually seeing anything. No, it's the thought. Yeah. It's the thought that we've added to other thoughts and concepts. There's a given and seeming shape and form and pattern on Bob and Australia and this and that. All thought-based. And the thought hasn't got any power. Of itself. It's just the content.
The function of the in or the seeing or the will. It's an expression of that. An expression of his other. So it's that created self. Or that created self that believes that it's having an emotional experience. It's not created. It hasn't got any... No. The one that's believed to be true and solid. Yeah. That's what I mean by it's mind created. That mind created self. That believes it's having the experience. Yeah, that believes it's going into that constantly, day to day. And it's seemingly real. Seemingly solid and substantial. It's a fiction. A total fiction.